What the heck does the Google vs. Oracle decision mean?

You can be forgiven if you’re not 100 percent certain what the US Supreme Court ruled in its Google vs. Oracle decision. Yes, we know that “Google won” — or, as Justice Stephen Breyer wrote, “Google’s copying [of the Java API] did not violate the copyright law.” This is true, but goes only so far. Google, after all, had gone to court with two big arguments: one, that APIs aren’t copyrightable and, two, that even if APIs are copyrightable, Google’s use of the Java API to develop Android constituted fair use.

To read this article in full, please click here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

[New post] Changes in how cholesterol breaks down in the body may accelerate progression of dementia

The biggest controversy surrounding Apple’s new iPad Pro isn’t actually an issue at all

[New post] Entertainment: You Season 3 Finally Gets Release Date: See the Bloody Announcement